First League Russia flag
0 : 2
HT 0 - 1
Full Time
Thursday, September 17, 2026 19:30 Stadion Tekstilshchik

Team Comparison

Tekstilshchik logo Tekstilshchik
VS
Rotor Volgograd logo Rotor Volgograd
L D L L W
Form
D W W D L
10
Goals Scored
22
22
Goals Conceded
17
14%
Win Rate
36%
51%
Possession
63%
6
Shots on Target
5
0%
Pass Accuracy
0%
3
Clean Sheets
4

Lineups

Rotor Volgograd logo

Rotor Volgograd

4-2-3-1
Dmitriy Parfenov
Coach

Starting XI

No. Player Age Pos
Emmersón photo
25 Emmersón D
N. Chagrov photo
13 N. Chagrov G
P. Gorelov photo
21 P. Gorelov M

Substitutes

Tekstilshchik logo

Tekstilshchik

4-2-3-1
Dmitriy Pyatibratov
Coach

Starting XI

No. Player Age Pos
77 S. Biblik F
N. Pershin photo
46 N. Pershin M
30 D. Simonov M
E. Guziev photo
74 E. Guziev D
S. Fadeev photo
58 S. Fadeev G

Substitutes

No. Player Age Pos
K. Nikitin photo
29 K. Nikitin F
M. Volkov photo
95 M. Volkov G
19 M. Noskov M
87 A. Filev F
55 V. Gapeev M
66 Y. Petin D

Match Preview

A fascinating First League chapter awaits on September 17, 2026 when Tekstilshchik take on Rotor Volgograd at the home ground — two sides with plenty to play for and everything to prove. The 18‑year‑old midfielder featured off the bench in the Foxes’ Carabao Cup first‑round tie last weekend, but could still depart before the window closes.

In the First League table, Tekstilshchik currently occupy 16th and Rotor Volgograd sit 9th, and the context adds genuine weight to what is already an intriguing fixture. Tekstilshchik are mired in a difficult campaign, DLLLW over their last five and a paltry win rate of 9.09% painting a bleak picture. The visitors have been a mixed bag on the road, WDLLL in their last five and a win rate of 36.36% reflecting their unpredictability. Goals could be in short supply or plentiful — Tekstilshchik average 0.73 per game to Rotor Volgograd's 1.64, and that gap may dictate the rhythm of the contest. In terms of net spend, Liverpool topped the table with £219.4m, followed by Ipswich (£190.7m), Spurs (£176m) and Hull (£160.5m).

Wing play is likely to be central to the contest. Tekstilshchik will look to stretch the pitch and isolate their wide attackers, while Rotor Volgograd must find a way to compress the space and choke the supply lines. Every word from Enzo Maresca's press conference including Man City team news and Manchester derby admission.

In fixtures as finely poised as this one, it often comes down to who holds their nerve in the big moments — and both camps have players who relish that responsibility. Whoever wins the individual duel between the two sides' chief playmakers is likely to dictate the rhythm and, ultimately, the destination of the points. United and Chelsea are reportedly set to go head-to-head for Bologna defender Jhon Lucumi.

The market has yet to form a strong view, and the contest looks genuinely difficult to call. Rotor Volgograd look well-equipped to take the points on the road, with a 1-2 victory well within their reach. With positions in the First League table to defend and momentum to chase, neither side can afford to leave anything in the tank. Important qualities given that Bournemouth will expect him to be proactive.

Comments

TikiTakaToni Sep 20, 2026

😫 even with the squad they have — Expected more from this fixture — The xG numbers tell the story, this was never going to be a high-scoring affair — RIGGED — 🤷

28
ThroughBallTheo Sep 19, 2026

❤️ Quality football from both sides — #Soccer 💯

4
ExtraTimeEmma Sep 18, 2026

Standard First League affair 💭

8
OverlapOliver Sep 18, 2026

Standard First League affair Standard First League affair Standard First League affair

3
ManMarkMia Sep 18, 2026

Decent game The xG numbers tell the story, this was never going to be a high-scoring affair given the injuries imo Standard First League affair Standard First League affair

2

Match Odds

Tekstilshchik
VS
Rotor Volgograd
19:30
Home 3.90
Draw 3.35
Away 1.88
Over 1.5 1.36
Over 2.5 2.19
BTTS Yes 1.97
Under 1.5 2.70
Under 2.5 1.62
BTTS No 1.73

Who Will Win

Tekstilshchik
VS
Rotor Volgograd
Home
40.0%
Draw
30.0%
Away
30.0%
16,011 votes